Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:30

Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Eius sequi culpa animi quod delectus deleniti deserunt.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is using tech to track or monitor your partner’s activities a sign of love, insecurity, or control?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Disney to pay almost $439 million to take full control of streaming service Hulu - AP News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What's your favorite stupid joke?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
'Disconnected' tyre should force Spanish GP strategy variety - The Race
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce spotted at wedding in Knoxville - WBIR